Wednesday, 12 April 2017

DICTATION EXERCISE - 40

Sir, on 24th March, 2017, I have participated in this Private Members’ Bill brought by my friend Mr. Vincent Pala to amend the Sixth Schedule to the Constitution of India in its application to constitution of District Councils and Regional Councils where the amendments were proposed for increasing the members from 30 to 40 and also the traditional occupations of the tribals including occupations relating to mines and minerals, very particularly in Meghalaya within the Khasi District Council. Broadly, I am in agreement with this proposed amendment. But Sir, the need for amendment of this provision of the Constitution does not end here because this Sixth Schedule has come into existence in 1952 that is from the very beginning or from the inception of the Constitution under Article 244(2) and Article 275(1). Now, under this provision of the Sixth Schedule,140 ten District Councils are being governed. In Meghalaya, there are three District Councils; in Assam, there are three District Councils;160 in Mizoram, there are three District Councils, and in Tripura, there is one District Council. But Sir, the Sixth Schedule is aiming at the section of people who are tribals or Adivasis. They are not residing only in these four States.
In India, there is about 12 crore Adivasi population and within the North Eastern States also, there are some other States where tribals are residing like in Manipur and also in Arunachal Pradesh. And within Assam also, there are a number of other Adivasi communities or Adivasi groups. So, today, after 65 or 67 years of enactment of this provision or this Act, we have to revisit or relook at the entire thing as to how far this provision280 has met or brought the changes to the lives of the Adivasis or the tribals in these particular District Councils and in particular, the four States and also in other States. That is why, what I would like to submit320 here is that today this Sixth Schedule has some legislative and judicial powers and also very limited executive powers.
But, in the present scenario, with just these two provisions, with limited judicial and executive powers, no marginalized section of population can survive. It does require further amendments and a revisit. So, how come the contours of the Sixth Schedule could be expanded to take care of social and economic development of this section of population? Sir, as I mentioned earlier, through the passage of the 73rd and 74th Amendments of the Constitution in 1992, certain functions have been devolved in420 non-Scheduled areas, where Fifth Schedule and Sixth Schedule are not implemented. That means, people at the rural level have got a structure, where they could participate in the process of planning as well as in the process of implementation. That has created some kind of a sensation in the rural population of our country and a kind of sense of480 belonging with the country. Sir, I would like to say that this sense is very much missing in the provisions of the Sixth Schedule. That is why, today it has to be seen, without copying the 73rd and 74th Amendments, as to how this kind of a structure can be devolved at the village level, at the district level and at the intermediate level considering the social and cultural aspects of tribal communities in hilly regions. Simultaneously, for the participation560 of the common people through the process of election, not only in Parliament or State Assembly but also at the village and intermediate level, an electoral body has to be constituted. Moreover, systems like fixation of accountability and audit, as has been done in other areas, should be implemented in the ADC areas also. That is why, it is very much essential today to revisit everything. Sir, we have Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council in our State. Two-thirds of640 the entire Tripura State and 19 tribes come under this Council. After three decades of promulgation of the Sixth Schedule, new sub-divisions, new blocks and new districts have been created. But, Tripura being a very small State with an area of 10,449 sq. kilometres, we find that in the remaining one-third area, urban areas have been developed and municipal corporations,700 municipal councils and nagar panchyats with urban infrastructure and urban facilities have come up. Similarly, in the ADC areas also, though not at par with the general areas, economic development is also coming up. So, they are also now aspiring to have urban bodies. That should also be thought of.
Another lacuna or handicap is that three-tier panchayat system is not applicable to the States which are covered under the Sixth Schedule. Any ADC or any other Council does not receive any fund directly as per the recommendation of the Finance Commission. It is a kind of deprivation, whether it800 is Tripura, Meghalaya or Assam because the mandatory provision of the Finance Commission is that there must be an elected body. So, there is a provision to give them funds from the erstwhile Planning Commission and now the NITI Aayog.840 Shri Arjun Meghwal, Minister of State for Finance is here. During the last financial year, Rs. 1,000 crore had been allotted to these ten ADCs, but this year, the allocation has been slashed to Rs. 500 crore. The allocation should have been increased by 20, 25 or 30 per cent, but it has been decreased by 50 per cent. What kind of justice has been done? This is a very important thing. I would like to mention this aspect again.
Sir, what I would like to tell is that this amendment to the Sixth Schedule is being discussed and debated for the last more than one decade. It happened even during the time of the UPA Government. From the Ministry960 of Home Affairs, suggestions from the State Governments had been sought and almost all the States – Tripura, Assam, Meghalaya980 and Mizoram - where the provisions of the Sixth Schedule are applicable have, time and again, sent their proposals and suggestions. It happened during the UPA Government’s time also. Now when this NDA-II came into office, they also again asked for their suggestions and the States have submitted their suggestions. When in the year 2014, I became, for the first time, a Member of this House, I raised a question before the hon. Home Minister and also got the reply. On 20th March, 2015 during the Budget Session, I had raised a question and got the reply that it was under the consideration of the Cabinet and the Cabinet would take a decision.
It was said that in the Budget Session of 2015-2016 itself this amendment will be brought; it will be passed; and it will be implemented. Now, we are1120 in the year 2017 and there is no sign of the Home Ministry bringing this amendment. It is very much disappointing. Sir, the main framework was conceived during the early 1950s. So, in the early 1950s there were so many things that were not there like half of the Ministries were not born at that time. Hence, it is automatically the aspiration of the people. Now, I was mentioning that the tribals are not living only in these four States. There are tribals in Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh, Odisha -- in the mainland where there are more than 11 crore of them and I am coming to that issue also. I would now like to particularly mention about Manipur. In Manipur, there are 16 Districts and out of these 16 Districts including the newly constituted District, in nine or ten Districts1260 tribals have the majority. In Manipur, there are 33 recognized Scheduled Tribe communities including sub-tribes, and 41.1 per cent of1280 the total population is tribals. The tribals are demanding the Sixth Schedule, the raksha kavach, since early 1970s and in the year 1974, under Article 371 (c), one such Council has been constituted, but that does not suffice to address the need of the people. So, the demand for the Sixth Schedule since the early 1970s is day by day not only increasing among the Adivasis because development is not only for the Adivasis, but development is for the entire State and the entire country. But unfortunately, the State Government and the Central Government did not pay heed to it. Now, instead of bringing that amendment in the Sixth Schedule, as was suggested to the Central Government, unfortunately, the previous1400 Manipur Government brought three legislations which created a huge controversy and a huge turmoil there. Unfortunately, nine youth were killed.

Though it is a Private Member Bill, I would suggest the Government that the Sixth Schedule be amended for Manipur also.1440 Kuki, Jomi and Naga communities are demanding that. The trend is not to allow these divisive forces, not to give them the indulgence and not to give them the opportunity. Now, the vast majority of those who abide by the Indian Constitution and Indian Law are demanding it. The Government should generously come forward to extend this Sixth Schedule in an amended form and also see as to how their socio-economic development could be taken care of. In Arunachal Pradesh, all the communities are tribal communities. Arunachal Pradesh is such a big State which is about 83,743 square kilometres1540 but the population is only 15,58,000 according to the 2011 census. All the population is of tribal communities but there are very small and marginal ethnic groups which have to protect their culture and their tradition etc. The people who belong to Mon and Patkai have raised their demand that ADC may be constituted under the Sixth Schedule.1597