The gas leak from a chemical factory in Vizag on 7th
of May killed 12 people. It is the most serious of three industrial
disasters that have taken place since the national lockdown was
eased on 3rd of May. The other two were in Tamil Nadu and
Chhattisgarh. The Vizag leak happened within a kilometer from a coronavirus
disease red zone which means that people have breached restrictions
to escape the effects of the gas that has spread over a five kilometer area.
Though the numbers are far smaller, the tragedy brings back memories of
the Bhopal gas
leak, the worst industrial disaster in the world, which killed
more than 3,500 people. The Vizag plant leak was styrene, a benzene derivative
used to manufacture plastics and resin. Exposure to it causes headache, loss
of hearing, and irritation to the mucous membrane.140
It can stay in the air for weeks and150 combine with oxygen to form the lethal
styrene dioxide. The160 Centre for Science and Environment
said that the leak seems to have happened because of the haste to
restart the plant without carrying out proper maintenance work.
While the government must focus on rescue and relief for now, what is
also required is a time-bound investigation to ascertain how safety was
compromised. Reports suggest that the plant has functioned without proper environmental
clearances for a substantial period since it was set up. It
must also be asked how the South Korean petrochemical giant, which owns LG Polymers,
the site of the accident, did not ensure that qualified people were in
place to check systems and open the plant. What happened in Vizag should be
considered a warning for other industries280 which are resuming
operations after a lengthy lockdown. India ’s industrial safety
record has been patchy at the best of times.300 Now in the
aftermath of the lockdown, it is likely to get further eroded.
While it is necessary to kickstart the320 economic engine, it
cannot be at the risk of compromising the safety of workers and
those who live in the vicinity of industrial plants. With shortage
of labour and monetary challenges brought on by coronavirus disease, it
becomes even more necessary to strengthen both public and occupational safety
systems. Industries must comply with regulations, and the government must
ensure that they are strictly enforced.
The
question we ask after every disaster is whether it could have been
avoided. An even better question to ask is: How can environmental damage be
avoided before it happens? India
has said that protecting420 the environment is desirable, and has
led by hosting international meetings such as the Conference of the Parties for
the Convention on Biological Diversity in 2012, the United Nations Conference450
to Combat Desertification in 2019, and the Convention on Migratory Species in
2020. But we are yet to decide what constitutes damage to the
environment. This assumes greater significance as the480
Government of India is reworking its Environment Impact Assessment
Notification. Such assessments are done to find out the impact a project has on
the environment. Getting environmental clearances depends on this assessment.
The 2020 EIA draft introduces a host of changes, introducing the concept
of post-facto clearance. This means that projects that started construction
without applying for EIA and environmental clearances will be appraised and may
receive clean chits. If they are found to be running in a
sustainable560
fashion, they will be allowed to apply for environmental clearances. If they
are found to be damaging the environment, closure of the project or other
actions will be recommended. But what is environmental damage? The 2020
draft says the Central Pollution Control Board should set the criteria for
damage assessment600 and remediation. The Central Pollution
Control Board was created in 1974. Its mandate relates to maintaining clean
water and air and preventing their pollution. Though pollution or leaks are one
of640
the most visible indicators of environmental damage, they are not the
only ones. In this regard, the NGT order is illustrative. The order
found illegal mining to be harmful to the environment on counts of waste
dumping, proximity to residences, causing the drying up of ponds, air
pollution through poor transport of coal, loss of groundwater, lack of
provision700
of healthcare, and loss of ecological services.
In
the case of long-term damage, the most significant thing is
the loss of ecological or ecosystem services. Ecosystem services refer
to the services provided by healthy nature, which include things like
pollination, quality of life, bio-filtration and more. A few things should
be kept in mind. First, the EIA notification draft should750
broaden the scope and understanding of environmental damage beyond just
pollution. Environmental damage, including purported long-term damage to
ecological services should be part of the assessment and the EIA notification. Second,
the world after the coronavirus pandemic has shown us800
that several human-led activities create novel interfaces that further lead to
consequences that we cannot control, such as viruses caused by the
disturbance to wildlife. We are also seeing how pristine the environment is
without our interventions. The images released840 by NASA reveal that
the air over the northern Gangetic plain is the cleanest it has been in
20 years. This clear view gives us a chance to plan projects in a way
that actively protects the environment rather than balances it against
political goals. Finally, if we can put India under lockdown, and run
offices remotely, it means we can indeed do the impossible as long as political
and societal900 will exists for it. A clean
environment is a social goal, as much as one mandated by international
conventions. This is the time to put trust in science and technical
expertise, and create a broader understanding of what environmental
damage is. Once we fully map it, we can set about960 preventing it. We
tend to pray after environmental castrophe strikes. But we need more
than thoughts and prayers to980 institutionalize environmental
protection. This is the best time to understand how environmental damage
impacts ecological services, and how this should reflect in the EIA processes. As
we pick up the pieces left behind from a virus, we must plan to
avoid more environmental grief.
Migrant
workers are like nowhere people. Yet, they are everywhere. From high-rises to
highways, who builds them? It is a silent army of migrant workers, working day
and night with no job security, no social safety1050 net, and poor
living conditions. Yet, we do not see their names on the billboards or
the foundation stones of these shining symbols of India ’s economic progress. From domestic
helps to drivers, from the vegetable seller to the roadside food
stall- their names are not on any payroll or pension plans or tax registers and
yet, without them the life1120 in urban and semi-urban areas
would be paralyzed. They are invisible; they are taken for granted; they are
treated with indifference in the best of times and with callousness
and cruelty in the worst. We think that the capital is the engine of
growth. But capital cannot generate output on its own; it needs labour. In a
country like India, it comes mainly through migrant labourers from rural
areas. The engine of growth runs on the fuels of migrant labour, which moves from
less productive sectors like agriculture to more productive sectors1200
like manufacturing and services. Without this fuel, the engine will
sputter and stop because of upward pressure on wages in the limited pool of local
labour markets. What drives the flow of migration is the prospect of
better opportunities in urban areas. Interestingly, research on migration shows1260
that there is significant under-migration compared to the potential labour
supply from rural areas. The main factor cited is risk-aversion. 1280
While average incomes are lower in rural areas, villages can eke out a living
easily and rely on strong informal safety nets based on social networks.
Very poor households may be unwilling to incur the financial and
psychological costs of migration and brave the subsistence risk of things
not panning out. The horrifying experience of migrant workers during
this crisis will only magnify such fears and reinforce the tendency towards
under-migration.
What does this imply for the post-lockdown
period? Could we simply press1350 a button and restart the engine of
growth? In a developing country like India , informal institutions and
social networks play a much larger role in the economy than in a developed
country. While trust and reputation are important1400 in every economic
sphere, these are the only currency in the informal sector where
there are no contracts and regulations, and hiring is based on word-of-mouth
referrals. Therefore, social networks
play a big role as reputation in the community1440 acts as a bond
against potential malfeasance or low productivity. But trust takes time
to build, as do social networks once they are disrupted. Therefore, the
assumption that after the crisis subsides, things will return to normal and an unlimited
supply of labour will flow in from the countryside is unrealistic. Wages
will have to rise significantly, and networks that underpin informal labour
markets will have to reform for the process to resume. 1500 Employers are
clearly seeing the writing on the wall. Therefore, we see attempts like the
construction industry lobbying a state government to cancel trains to stop
migrant workers from heading back home. The logic of the market is often
invoked to say that there are no free lunches when talking about relief
packages for the poor. But the same logic also says that the only way to induce
labour to work is through improvement in wages and living and work conditions,
not coercion. Given that 90 per1600 cent of the Indian workforce is
in the informal sector with no job security or benefits, the safety net
provided by the government must be strengthened to attract migrant
workers back after this ordeal. 1634
---------------------------
https://youtu.be/Idqfsr8JwEQ
https://youtu.be/Idqfsr8JwEQ