Saturday 3 June 2023

ENGLISH SHORTHAND DICTATION-323

 

The present Writ Petition arises out of the incident dated 5th of January, 2021 wherein on a visit to District Firozpur, State of Punjab, the convoy of the Prime Minister was stuck on a flyover for around 20 minutes. Petitioner, an NGO which purports to work for advocates across the country and takes up causes that are in public interest, therefore, seeks that this Court take cognizance of the serious and deliberate lapse on part of the Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 concerning security and movement of the Prime Minister of the country; and direct100 the learned District Judge, Bhatinda, to collect all official documents and materials from all possible sources pertaining to the movements120 and deployment of Punjab Police in connection with the visit at the earliest and produce the same before this Court. The petitioner has also prayed that this Court issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction fixing responsibility of the Respondent No. 2 and Respondent No. 3 and place them under suspension and further direct the Respondent No. 4 to initiate departmental action against the same. Petitioner contends that the incident constitutes a very grave security200 breach that could have had significant repercussions as it impacts the safety of the Hon'ble Prime Minister.

Given the seriousness of the subject matter, and the need to ensure a thorough investigation into the alleged lapses by the security apparatus,240 we took up the matter on the 07th January, 2022 when we heard the Senior Advocate on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Solicitor General on behalf of the Union of India and the learned Advocate General for the State of Punjab. Taking into consideration the arguments advanced by the parties with respect to the issues300 relating to the security of the Hon'ble Prime Minister and other related issues raised by them, we deem it appropriate for the time being to direct the Registrar General, Punjab and Haryana High Court to secure and preserve the records relating to the Hon'ble Prime Minister's scheduled tour of Punjab on 05th January 2022.

We direct the360 Director General of Police, Union Territory of Chandigarh and an officer of the National Investigation Agency, not below the rank of Inspector General, to be nominated by the Director General of National Investigation Agency, to assist the Registrar General, Punjab400 and Haryana High Court to forthwith secure and seize the records from the State police as well as Central agencies. We further direct the State Government of Punjab, including the police authorities, the Special Protection Group and any other Central or State agencies to cooperate and to provide necessary assistance in securing and seizing the records. We direct the Registrar General, Punjab and Haryana High Court to keep the records in his safe custody for the time being. The Registry480 is directed to forward a copy of this order electronically to the Registrar General, Punjab and Haryana High Court, the500 Director General of Police, Union Territory of Chandigarh, the Director General, National Investigation Agency and the Principal Secretary, Home, State of Punjab. In deference to the above-stated order, a compliance report has been submitted wherein it has been stated that the relevant records have been received, seized, and secured. The same have been sealed and placed in the custody of560 the Punjab and Haryana High Court. On the previous date of hearing, it was also brought to our notice that the State of Punjab has constituted a Committee to carry out a thorough probe into the lapses that occurred during600 the Firozpur visit of the Hon'ble Prime Minister. The Committee comprised of a Former Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court and Principal Secretary, Home Affairs and Justice, Government of Punjab.

It was urged on behalf of learned Senior640 Counsel for the petitioner that since lapses in the breach of security of the Hon'ble Prime Minister are being seriously attributed to the authorities of the State of Punjab, the constitution of an Enquiry Committee by the State was nothing but an abortive attempt to become a Judge in its own cause. The State of Punjab, on the other hand,700 has placed on record copies of the show cause notices issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs,720 Internal Security Division dated January 06, 2022 to various functionaries of the State of Punjab including its Chief Secretary and Director General of Police.

The show cause notices required the officers to respond within 24 hours as to why disciplinary action under the All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969 should not be initiated against them for their "omissions and commissions". The learned Advocate General for the State of Punjab urged that the800 Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India has, in a way, already held the officers of Government of Punjab 'guilty' of the alleged negligence and breach of security of the Hon'ble Prime Minister.

He maintained that none of the agencies840 of the State Government had committed a dereliction of their responsibility for the security and safety of the Hon'ble Prime Minister, yet there is a smear campaign to discredit the State Government. All the same, the learned Advocate General for the State fairly offered that the State is more than willing to have an independent enquiry of the matter.900

We have heard learned counsel for the parties at considerable length and studied the provisions of the Special Protection Group Act, 1988 along with the relevant contents of the Blue Book. The legislative scheme of the Act is quite comprehensive with respect to ensuring proximate security of the Prime Minister, or a former Prime Minister, or their family960 members, as the case may be.

The Blue Book contains a clear and detailed procedure to be observed by the State Authorities and the Special Protection Group to ensure full safety and security of the Prime Minister while he is1000 touring a State. The additional object is to avoid any human error, negligence or any wilful omission or commission which may hamper or expose the safety and security of the Executive Head of the nation while he is traveling in a particular State. Any lapse in this regard can lead to devastating and serious consequences.

It is not necessary for us to elucidate more on facts as the lapse regarding the breach of security of the Prime Minister during his1080 visit to Firozpur on 5th January, 2022 is not seriously disputed by either party. There is, however,1100 a blame game between the State and Central Government as to who is responsible for such lapses. War of words between them is no solution. It may rather impair the need of a robust mechanism to respond at such a critical juncture. We, therefore, find merit in the submission the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner that not only are the officers responsible for the above stated lapse liable to be identified, but there is also a greater urgency to evolve new measures that may ensure there is no recurrence of such lapses in the future.1196